all
reviews
home email
alt-shift
Author:
Ursula K. Le Guin
Publication
Date: 1969
(1st ed.)
Publisher:
Walker (1st ed.)
213
pages
Buy
it on Amazon
Summary
As he tries
to gain the trust of an arctic world, a galactic envoy finds hardship
and friendship in the unlikeliest of places.
In
a Nutshell
An understated
and poignant SF classic, displaying a rare sensibility and humanity.
Review
Ursula K. Le
Guin is often cited as a SF master, and with good reason. She brings
to the genre a total mastery of its concepts, and adds to it a sensibility
and feminity that is often lacking. Make no mistake : Le Guin is
years ahead of the usual 'romance SF' that is (often unjustly) linked
to SF women writers. Her books are merciless, intellectual, poignant,
and complex.
The Left
Hand of Darkness
stands as the epitome of all these qualities, and is often cited
as Le Guin's masterpiece. I have not read her other novels yet,
but on its own, this is a novel that stands superbly well, and has
every right to be called a SF classic. The story is slow-moving,
and the tone is somber and reflective, but the book is nevertheless
a page-turner that takes pleasure in challenging and delighting
the reader.
The novel tells
the tale of Genly Ai, the Envoy of the Ekumen of Known World to
the planet Winter. Genly is sent alone to a hostile, ice-locked
world on a mission to convince its governments to join a galactic
civilization. The inhabitants of Gethen are in all aspects normal
humans, aside from one critical difference : for most of the time,
they are gender-neutral, except when they enter a mating period
and can become either male or female. Intelligent, resourceful and
diplomatic, Genly nevertheless falls victim to Gethenian politics,
but he finds friendship from the unlikeliest of sources.
The use of a
gender-neutral society as a setting for the novel is interesting,
and Ms. Le Guin uses it to make a few interesting points. For instance,
she postulates that war on a world such as Gethen doesn't exist,
as a direct consequence of its skewed gender roles; a point which
I find challenging and interesting whether I agree with it or not.
As a whole, however, these concepts, surprisingly, isn't the core
of the novel. At best, they provide an exotic and alien perspective,
but not much more.
The same can
be said for the actic locale: it's interesting and well-fleshed
out by Le Guin, but it doesn't generate the same sense of wonder
than, say, Frank Herbert's Dune. The feeling of coldness and isolation
is well-presented, and it enhances the sense of strangeness of the
world. It doesn't, however, provide a framework by which a truly
fascinating society is created.
That being said,
what works fantastically well in Ursula Le Guin's novel is the deep
sense of alienation and friendship that she portrays against this
canvas of artic weather and gender strangeness. Ultimately, the
story is that of two human beings, how they come together in friendship,
and what still holds them apart. The minute, multiple ways in which
Genly is set apart from his Gethenian guests is truly fascinating,
and the way he and a fellow Gethenian overcome these barriers is
poignant and tragic.
When all is
said and done, The Left Hand of Darkness is a novel of
friendship beyond cultures. As an expatriate in China, these themes
resonated exceptionally strongly with me, and they are expressed
with more subtlety, finesse, and accuracy than I have ever seen
before in SF. For this reason, The Left Hand of Darkness
deserves its place among the classics of SF.
Note : My
edition of The Left Hand of Darkness (Ace paperback) features
an introduction by Ursula K. Le Guin, and I must say a word on it.
In it, Ms. Le Guin carefully explains that SF is not about predicting
the future, but about creating a metaphor of the present. That's
a very valid comment, except that Le Guin drives it home by explaining
to great pains that the world of Gethen and the Ekumen of Known
Worlds do not exist. Well, duh. If it were a near-future novel,
I would understand the effort, but in the case of a novel of the
far future, it comes across as contrite and patronizing, not to
mention that it opens the novel by forcing the reader to disbelieve
what is about to follow.
all
reviews
home email
alt-shift |